Presented a motion on the consequences of the Supreme Court judgment annulling of buildability and teleportation that may affect some Partial Plans
Fernando and Alfonso Sanchez Romera.
We have filed a complaint with the Civil Guard Seprona where noted 6 dumps and uncontrolled landfills, some along the Camino Viejo de Archivel and others in the urban environment of Archivel.
Attached full contents of the complaint with the state cadastral references of discharges.
We ask the Environment Councillor to be accountable, to its permanent incompetence in this matter, as this adds to what we have been reported over the last three years, and the problem has been increasing.
This problem requires a set of actions that are not limited to the approval of the relevant directive, on the other hand comes several years too late.
Follow this so we will have to ask for his resignation.
Moreover we will present a motion to consider the consequences of the judgment delivered by the Supreme Court makes a final judgment n ° 91/2011 of the Court of Justice of Murcia-TSJ-condemning bad practices of urban many municipalities in the region, with the so-called teleportation of buildable land undevelopable to other areas which has resulted in excessive and irregular urban land use in many partial plans.
The judgment goes on to say that new developable areas, adjacent to protected land, which by their nature are therefore undevelopable, can not set their affiliated general systems (eg for parks and gardens) on these soils protected and also move the buildability they correspond to the rest of the industry or other areas, which only benefited the speculative interests before the City Council bowed.
From the Municipal Socialist Group are convinced that this can have an impact on some of the more than 15 Partial Plans approved for the duration of the party's disastrous property boom that municipal officials do not want to miss.
So let's make a motion to handle technical and legal study that says if were excessive and improper harvesting some partial plans like the "Barranco del Nevazo" (UR-S2), located north of Buenavista urbanization.
In this case, established a SGEL (general system of open spaces) on a steep hillside and protected inaccessible bush, crossed by the Barranco del Nevazo and sidewalk buildability moving the rest of the sector, in our view wrongly, in against the provisions of the General Plan itself, since they have to be accessible and usable areas for citizens, and on the other for violating the provisions of the Land Act.
Finally we noted that we will present arguments to the approval of the amendment to the ordinance regulating livestock activities livestock facilities.
Let's make one last effort to set minimum conditions of distances to ensure that existing housing and tourist facilities are not adversely affected by some particular interests, as was the case with the claims of the headman of Barranda.
Source: PSOE Caravaca de la Cruz