Portal de Caravaca de la Cruz

www.portaldecaravaca.com

Caravaca de la Cruz - SpanishCaravaca de la Cruz - English
detail of Caravaca de la Cruz

 

Opinion article: "Another blow to the City Auditorium is illegal." (04/06/2015)

The Superior Court of Murcia (TSJ) seems to have expected them to pass the municipal elections to communicate to the parties a statement that can be devastating, considering, unmitigated, the project town planning Auditorium is illegal, being contrary the PGMO (Municipal General Management Plan).

It has happened what we feared as had already been shown in numerous claims from the PSOE, and also denounced the possible outcome which we revealed a few months ago.

The outgoing government team PP leaves us another version of the UTE Caravaca has come to swell the already crazy mortgage are paying all caravaqueños failed due to macro-absurd and impractical, as the new football stadium, which is not He did, and now it is the Auditorium, which will be more paralyzed than it is.

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of INTERSA, one of the companies that competed to project award process works and delauditorio equipment.

This company filed two disputes over this issue.

The first Contentious Court No. 3 of Murcia.

Here INTERSA uses the award to Ferrovial Agroman and subsequently signed contract, mainly for violating the General Plan (PGMO), claiming some 550,000 euros for the benefit forgone and losses, unless it was possible to roll back the case to the adjudication process.

In the second dispute to the Supreme Court, which has won so far, challenges the legality in urban area of ​​the crazy height reached by the project awarded, which reaches 42 m above ground, and eliminate social housing forecasts for that area as understood by the applicant, all against the provisions of the PGMO Caravaca, drafting and approving the resulting Special Plan "Multifunctional Cultural Center" that the Supreme Court has declared invalid, as we note in our arguments and so we opposed from the PSOE in Parliament.

The question now is, first, that the already executed (phase structure) work is illegal, with about 5 billion invested, a total budget of 12 million.

Second, for all we know, the Court of the Contentious No. 3 was waiting for the Supreme Court to rule in urban, as it has already done so, to issue a ruling is pending on the award process the contract was awarded to Ferrovial Agroman.

Therefore, if the Court declared null also the procedure of the contest and award, which is most likely, since you can not bid on a project that is manifestly contrary to General Plan without first modified this, the added problem is the possible compensation, both the contractor, as the applicant, who would face the City for more than a million euros, so this would be an issue if anything more complicated than the UTE Caravaca, by serious urban, but also useless defaults, because in this case we would pay all caravaqueños also a large sum (6 or 7 million euros) to avoid auditorium, or anything like it., no one takes responsibility.

This should not be so.

You can not leave this council worse.

PS: If the future PP spokesman would have us believe that this does not cost us anything to caravaqueños, bad starts, just point one fact: the City assumes 25% of the cost of the work that we are already paying, and 5.5 million euros that have already received from the Autonomous Community, by way of grant, will have to be returned if the project does not get to run.

Alfonso Sanchez Marin, was Municipal Councillor and Spokesperson of the Socialist Group Caravaca.

Source: PSOE Caravaca de la Cruz

Notice
UNE-EN ISO 9001:2000 - ER-0131/2006 Región de Murcia
© 2024 Alamo Networks S.L. - C/Alamo 8, 30850 Totana (Murcia) Privacy policy - Legal notice - Cookies
Este sitio web utiliza cookies para facilitar y mejorar la navegación. Si continúas navegando, consideramos que aceptas su uso. Más información